The Evaluations of The Second Interview

Here is The link to the evaluations of the second interview


For the second interview, the winner I think is Rashmi Pun.

The parameters that I used to evaluate the second interview were exactly the same as the ones that were posted on the homepage of our course. On the whole, Rashmi did very well on the five parameters. 

Firstly, Rashmi's preparation for her second interviews is well documented. I was very glad to see that how much efforts she put on her interview. She reviewed her first interview, read more articles, and gathered more facts on Sri Lanka so she could be more confident in the second interview. It was a good idea to let her friend introduce an interviewee to her and it is also a good idea to interview the person in her own place. Rashmi also described the interview at length.

Secondly, Rashmi’s country report is also informative. Based on the country report on Sri Lanka she posted for the first interview, she added some additional information on her country report for her second interview, which is great. It is also helpful to write some information on the country report related to her interview questions.

Thirdly, I like the questions she used for her interview. Some questions and the answers to the questions are very interesting to read, for example the family structure and interaction between males and females. And I also got to know something on Sri Lanka.  It was good to see that she explained her questions in a different to make the questions more understandable for her interviewer and the interviewer answered those finally.

Finally, I have to say that after reading all of the posts for the second interviews for all of my classmates her post is one of the most readable ones. I went to her blog and I knew where everything was located immediately. And there are just few grammar errors she made on her blog.

Overall, Rashmi did a good job on her second interview. Way to go!!!